Radeon RX Vega M GL vs Tesla T4
When choosing between Radeon RX Vega M GL and Tesla T4, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon RX Vega M GL and Tesla T4.
Tesla T4
Radeon RX Vega M GL is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon RX Vega M GL is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon RX Vega M GL here:
Main Specs
Radeon RX Vega M GL | Tesla T4 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 70 Watt |
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla T4 has 7% more power consumption, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
- Radeon RX Vega M GL is connected by IGP, and Tesla T4 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla T4 has 12 GB more memory, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
- Radeon RX Vega M GL is used in Laptops, and Tesla T4 - in Desktops.
- Radeon RX Vega M GL is build with GCN 4.0 architecture, and Tesla T4 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Radeon RX Vega M GL is 346 MHz higher, than Tesla T4.
- Radeon RX Vega M GL is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla T4 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla T4 is 8600 MHz higher, than Radeon RX Vega M GL.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Radeon RX Vega M GL and Tesla T4 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
Radeon RX Vega M GL and Tesla T4 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Far Cry 5 is 95% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Fortnite is 81% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Forza Horizon 4 is 96% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Metro Exodus is 121% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 89% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 113% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Radeon RX Vega M GL. |
Full Specs
Radeon RX Vega M GL | Tesla T4 | |
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Turing |
Code name | Polaris 22 | TU104 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 February 2018 | 13 September 2018 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 2560 |
Core clock speed | 931 MHz | 585 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1011 MHz | 1590 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 13,600 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 80.88 | 254.4 |
Floating-point performance | 2,588 gflops | |
Length | 168 mm | |
Memory bus width | 1024 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | 10000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | 320.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
Check Price |