GeForce GTX 680MX vs Radeon Sky 500
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 680MX and Radeon Sky 500 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 680MX will be the best choice, for others Radeon Sky 500 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Sky 500
GeForce GTX 680MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 680MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 680MX here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon Sky 500 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 122 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- Radeon Sky 500 has 22% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 680MX.
- Radeon Sky 500 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 680MX.
- GeForce GTX 680MX is used in Laptops, and Radeon Sky 500 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 680MX is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Sky 500 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Sky 500 is 230 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 680MX.
- GeForce GTX 680MX and Radeon Sky 500 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Sky 500 is 2300 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 680MX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 680MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Battlefield 5 is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 680MX. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 680MX and Radeon Sky 500 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 680MX. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTX 680MX and Radeon Sky 500 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 680MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Far Cry 5 is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 680MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Fortnite is 47% more, than GeForce GTX 680MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Forza Horizon 4 is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 680MX. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Grand Theft Auto V is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 680MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Metro Exodus is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 680MX. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 680MX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 24% more, than GeForce GTX 680MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 680MX. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 67% more, than GeForce GTX 680MX. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 680MX. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon Sky 500 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Pitcairn | |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 23 October 2012 | 27 March 2013 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 720 MHz | 950 MHz |
Transistor count | 3540 Million | 2,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 76.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | |
Length | 242 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 154 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
SLI options | + | |
3D Vision | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 57 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |