GeForce MX350 vs Radeon Sky 500
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce MX350 and Radeon Sky 500, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce MX350 stacks up against Radeon Sky 500, check out specs charts below.
Radeon Sky 500
GeForce MX350 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX350 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX350 here:
Main Specs
GeForce MX350 | Radeon Sky 500 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon Sky 500 has 650% more power consumption, than GeForce MX350.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon Sky 500 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce MX350.
- GeForce MX350 is used in Laptops, and Radeon Sky 500 - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX350 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon Sky 500 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 404 MHz higher, than Radeon Sky 500.
- GeForce MX350 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon Sky 500 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 2200 MHz higher, than Radeon Sky 500.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 125% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Battlefield 5 is 134% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Dota 2 is 23% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Far Cry 5 is 123% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Fortnite is 97% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Grand Theft Auto V is 88% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Metro Exodus is 138% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 138% more, than GeForce MX350. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in World of Tanks is 4% more, than GeForce MX350. |
Full Specs
GeForce MX350 | Radeon Sky 500 | |
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | Pitcairn |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 20 February 2020 | 27 March 2013 |
Pipelines | 640 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 950 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 2,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 29.98 | 76.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | |
Length | 242 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 56.06 GB/s | 154 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 6.1 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |