Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon Sky 500
In this comparison between Iris Plus Graphics 640 and Radeon Sky 500 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Plus Graphics 640 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Sky 500 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Sky 500
Iris Plus Graphics 640 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 640 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 640 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Radeon Sky 500 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon Sky 500 has 900% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon Sky 500 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 has 28 GB more memory, than Radeon Sky 500.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is used in Laptops, and Radeon Sky 500 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon Sky 500 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Sky 500 is 650 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 640.
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon Sky 500 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 355% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Battlefield 5 is 353% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 142% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Dota 2 is 101% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Far Cry 5 is 422% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Fortnite is 277% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Forza Horizon 4 is 384% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Grand Theft Auto V is 220% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Minecraft is 36% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 109% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 24−27 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 376% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in World of Tanks is 42% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 640. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 640 | Radeon Sky 500 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Pitcairn |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 3 January 2017 | 27 March 2013 |
Pipelines | 48 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 950 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 2,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.80 | 76.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | |
Length | 242 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 154 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.2.131 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs GeForce GTX 660M
- Radeon Sky 500 vs UHD Graphics G1 Ice Lake 32 EU
- Radeon Sky 500 vs GeForce GTX 660M
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon R9 M395
- Iris Plus Graphics 640 vs Radeon R9 270X
- Radeon Sky 500 vs Radeon R9 M395
- Radeon Sky 500 vs Radeon R9 270X