Quadro K2000M vs Radeon Sky 500
When choosing between Quadro K2000M and Radeon Sky 500, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro K2000M and Radeon Sky 500.
Radeon Sky 500
Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K2000M | Radeon Sky 500 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon Sky 500 has 172% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000M.
- Quadro K2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon Sky 500 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Sky 500 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2000M.
- Quadro K2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon Sky 500 - in Desktops.
- Quadro K2000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Sky 500 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Sky 500 is 205 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
- Quadro K2000M and Radeon Sky 500 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Sky 500 is 3000 MHz higher, than Quadro K2000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
Quadro K2000M and Radeon Sky 500 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 190% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Radeon Sky 500. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Dota 2 is 144% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Fortnite is 443% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Forza Horizon 4 is 677% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Minecraft is 41% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 740% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 942% more, than Quadro K2000M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Quadro K2000M. |
Full Specs
Quadro K2000M | Radeon Sky 500 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N14P-Q3 | Pitcairn |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 1 June 2012 | 27 March 2013 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 950 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 2,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 23.84 | 76.00 |
Floating-point performance | 572.2 gflops | 2,432 gflops |
Length | 242 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 154 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |