Radeon R9 M280X vs Radeon Sky 500
When comparing Radeon R9 M280X and Radeon Sky 500, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon R9 M280X and Radeon Sky 500 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon Sky 500
Radeon R9 M280X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M280X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M280X here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R9 M280X | Radeon Sky 500 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | Not Listed | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon R9 M280X is used in Laptops, and Radeon Sky 500 - in Desktops.
- Radeon R9 M280X is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon Sky 500 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Sky 500 is 50 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M280X.
- Radeon R9 M280X and Radeon Sky 500 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 720% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Battlefield 5 is 655% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon R9 M280X and Radeon Sky 500 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 195% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| Radeon R9 M280X and Radeon Sky 500 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Dota 2 is 125% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Far Cry 5 is 840% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Fortnite is 411% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Forza Horizon 4 is 544% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Grand Theft Auto V is 272% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Metro Exodus is 720% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Minecraft is 64% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 471% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 10−12 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 675% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Sky 500 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than Radeon R9 M280X. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R9 M280X | Radeon Sky 500 | |
| Architecture | GCN | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Saturn XT | Pitcairn |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 February 2015 | 27 March 2013 |
| Pipelines | 896 | 1280 |
| Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,080 million | 2,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 61.60 | 76.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,792 gflops | 2,432 gflops |
| Length | 242 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 154 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | Not Listed | PCIe 3.0 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |