GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon Vega 10 mobile
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon Vega 10 mobile, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 460 SE stacks up against Radeon Vega 10 mobile, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Radeon Vega 10 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Vega 10 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Vega 10 mobile here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon Vega 10 mobile | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 10 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 1400% more power consumption, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Vega 10 mobile uses IGP interface.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Radeon Vega 10 mobile - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon Vega 10 mobile - with GCN 5.0.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Vega 10 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 26% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon Vega 10 mobile have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 22% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 25% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 38% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 31% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 10% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 30% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 15% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon Vega 10 mobile | |
Architecture | Fermi | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | GF104 | Raven |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 15 November 2010 | 8 January 2019 |
Pipelines | 288 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1301 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 4,940 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 52.04 |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 470M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro M600M
- Radeon Vega 10 mobile vs GeForce GTX 470M
- Radeon Vega 10 mobile vs Quadro M600M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce 9800M GTS SLI
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon R7 M380
- Radeon Vega 10 mobile vs GeForce 9800M GTS SLI
- Radeon Vega 10 mobile vs Radeon R7 M380