GRID M6 8Q vs Radeon Vega 10 mobile
In this comparison between GRID M6 8Q and Radeon Vega 10 mobile you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M6 8Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon Vega 10 mobile will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M6 8Q
Radeon Vega 10 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Vega 10 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Vega 10 mobile here:
Main Specs
| GRID M6 8Q | Radeon Vega 10 mobile | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M6 8Q has 900% more power consumption, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile.
- GRID M6 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Vega 10 mobile uses IGP interface.
- GRID M6 8Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon Vega 10 mobile - in Laptops.
- GRID M6 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Vega 10 mobile - with GCN 5.0.
- GRID M6 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Vega 10 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 144% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 146% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 88% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 73% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 114% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 153% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 103% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 25% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 120% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 157% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Radeon Vega 10 mobile. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M6 8Q | Radeon Vega 10 mobile | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Code name | GM204 | Raven |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 8 January 2019 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 722 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1301 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 4,940 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 69.31 | 52.04 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,218 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Check Price |