FirePro S7150 vs Radeon Vega 11 mobile
In this comparison between FirePro S7150 and Radeon Vega 11 mobile you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S7150 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Vega 11 mobile will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro S7150
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon Vega 11 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Vega 11 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Vega 11 mobile here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7150 | Radeon Vega 11 mobile | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7150 has 900% more power consumption, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile.
- FirePro S7150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Vega 11 mobile uses IGP interface.
- FirePro S7150 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Vega 11 mobile - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7150 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Radeon Vega 11 mobile - with GCN 5.0.
- FirePro S7150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Vega 11 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Battlefield 5 is 466% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Fortnite is 335% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 483% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 244% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 119% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 400% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7150 | Radeon Vega 11 mobile | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | Tonga | Picasso |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 1 February 2016 | 6 January 2019 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 704 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1400 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 4,940 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 117.8 | 61.60 |
Floating-point performance | 3,763 gflops | |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Check Price |