FirePro W8100 vs Radeon Vega 11 mobile
When comparing FirePro W8100 and Radeon Vega 11 mobile, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W8100 and Radeon Vega 11 mobile is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro W8100
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon Vega 11 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Vega 11 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Vega 11 mobile here:
Main Specs
FirePro W8100 | Radeon Vega 11 mobile | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W8100 has 1366% more power consumption, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile.
- FirePro W8100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Vega 11 mobile uses IGP interface.
- FirePro W8100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Vega 11 mobile - in Laptops.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Vega 11 mobile - with GCN 5.0.
- FirePro W8100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Vega 11 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 475% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 335% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 483% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 255% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 119% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 400% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. |
Full Specs
FirePro W8100 | Radeon Vega 11 mobile | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | Hawaii | Picasso |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2014 | 6 January 2019 |
Pipelines | 2560 | 704 |
Core clock speed | 824 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1400 MHz | |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | 4,940 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 131.8 | 61.60 |
Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | |
Length | 279 mm | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W8100 vs Quadro P2000
- FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
- Radeon Vega 11 mobile vs Quadro P2000
- Radeon Vega 11 mobile vs GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
- FirePro W8100 vs FirePro M5950
- FirePro W8100 vs Radeon HD 4870 X2
- Radeon Vega 11 mobile vs FirePro M5950
- Radeon Vega 11 mobile vs Radeon HD 4870 X2