FireStream 9270 vs Radeon Vega 11 mobile
When choosing between FireStream 9270 and Radeon Vega 11 mobile, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9270 and Radeon Vega 11 mobile.
FireStream 9270
Radeon Vega 11 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Vega 11 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Vega 11 mobile here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Radeon Vega 11 mobile | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 966% more power consumption, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Vega 11 mobile uses IGP interface.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Vega 11 mobile - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon Vega 11 mobile - with GCN 5.0.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Vega 11 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Battlefield 5 is 8% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9270 and Radeon Vega 11 mobile have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 4% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Vega 11 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Dota 2 is 3% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Vega 11 mobile in Fortnite is 3% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Forza Horizon 4 is 15% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| FireStream 9270 and Radeon Vega 11 mobile have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Minecraft is 5% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Vega 11 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 11% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| FireStream 9270 and Radeon Vega 11 mobile have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Radeon Vega 11 mobile | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | GCN 5.0 |
| Code name | RV770 | Picasso |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 13 November 2008 | 6 January 2019 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 704 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1400 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 4,940 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 61.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| Check Price |