Quadro K2200M vs Radeon Vega 11 mobile
When comparing Quadro K2200M and Radeon Vega 11 mobile, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro K2200M and Radeon Vega 11 mobile is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro K2200M
Radeon Vega 11 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Vega 11 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Vega 11 mobile here:
Main Specs
Quadro K2200M | Radeon Vega 11 mobile | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro K2200M has 333% more power consumption, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile.
- Quadro K2200M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon Vega 11 mobile uses IGP interface.
- Quadro K2200M is used in Desktops, and Radeon Vega 11 mobile - in Laptops.
- Quadro K2200M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Vega 11 mobile - with GCN 5.0.
- Quadro K2200M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Vega 11 mobile - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 241% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 118% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 85% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 333% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 170% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 233% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 137% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 43% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 187% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 266% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Radeon Vega 11 mobile. |
Full Specs
Quadro K2200M | Radeon Vega 11 mobile | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | GM107 | Picasso |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 19 July 2014 | 6 January 2019 |
Pipelines | 640 | 704 |
Core clock speed | 667 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1400 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 4,940 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 26.68 | 61.60 |
Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |