FirePro M5100 vs Tesla C2050
When choosing between FirePro M5100 and Tesla C2050, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M5100 and Tesla C2050.
Tesla C2050
FirePro M5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5100 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M5100 | Tesla C2050 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M5100 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2050 has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M5100.
- FirePro M5100 is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5100 is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro M5100 is 151 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- FirePro M5100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M5100 is 1500 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 80% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 40% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 31% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 71% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 54% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 73% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 47% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 13% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 26% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 53% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 66% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than FirePro M5100. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M5100 | Tesla C2050 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Fermi |
| Code name | Venus | GF100 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 October 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 775 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.00 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 992.0 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 108 Mh/s | 90 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |