FirePro R5000 vs Tesla C2050

When comparing FirePro R5000 and Tesla C2050, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro R5000 and Tesla C2050 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

FirePro R5000 Check Price

Tesla C2050

Main Specs

	FirePro R5000	Tesla C2050
Power consumption (TDP)	350 Watt	238 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	3 GB
Display Connectors	2x mini-DisplayPort	1x DVI
	Check Price

FirePro R5000 has 47% more power consumption, than Tesla C2050.
FirePro R5000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2050 has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro R5000.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro R5000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of FirePro R5000 is 251 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
FirePro R5000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
FirePro R5000 is 31 mm longer, than Tesla C2050.
Memory clock speed of FirePro R5000 is 200 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	12−14	18−20
ultra / 1080p	8−9	10−11
QHD / 1440p	2−3	4−5
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	27−30	35−40
medium / 1080p	16−18	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 38% more, than FirePro R5000.
high / 1080p	21−24	27−30
ultra / 1080p	18−20	24−27
QHD / 1440p	5−6	8−9
4K / 2160p	4−5	6−7
low / 720p	45−50	60−65
medium / 1080p	24−27	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 35% more, than FirePro R5000.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro R5000.
low / 768p	190−200	220−230
medium / 768p	160−170	190−200
ultra / 1080p	90−95	110−120
QHD / 1440p	50−55	70−75
4K / 2160p	30−33	35−40
high / 768p	130−140	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than FirePro R5000.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than FirePro R5000.
low / 768p	100−110	110−120
medium / 768p	85−90	100−110
ultra / 1080p	55−60	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than FirePro R5000.
high / 1080p	16−18	21−24
ultra / 1080p	14−16	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	5−6	7−8
low / 720p	35−40	45−50
medium / 1080p	16−18	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than FirePro R5000.
high / 1080p	21−24	27−30
ultra / 1080p	16−18	21−24
QHD / 1440p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	90−95	110−120
medium / 1080p	45−50	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 23% more, than FirePro R5000.
high / 1080p	21−24	30−35
ultra / 1080p	18−20	21−24
QHD / 1440p	7−8	10−12
low / 720p	45−50	60−65
medium / 1080p	24−27	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 37% more, than FirePro R5000.
low / 768p	80−85	95−100
medium / 768p	70−75	85−90
high / 1080p	24−27	35−40
ultra / 1080p	10−12	14−16
QHD / 1440p	2−3	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than FirePro R5000.
high / 1080p	8−9	10−12
ultra / 1080p	6−7	9−10
4K / 2160p	2−3	2−3
low / 720p	24−27	35−40
medium / 1080p	10−12	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than FirePro R5000.
low / 768p	100−110	110−120
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 9% more, than FirePro R5000.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	50−55	65−70
medium / 1080p	21−24	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than FirePro R5000.
high / 1080p	12−14	14−16
ultra / 1080p	9−10	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	35−40
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than FirePro R5000.
low / 768p	45−50	65−70
medium / 768p	30−33	40−45
high / 1080p	16−18	21−24
ultra / 1080p	10−11	12−14
4K / 2160p	7−8	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 36% more, than FirePro R5000.
low / 768p	95−100	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	30−35	35−40
high / 768p	50−55	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 1% more, than FirePro R5000.

Full Specs

	FirePro R5000	Tesla C2050
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Fermi
Code name	Pitcairn	GF100
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	25 February 2013	25 July 2011
Pipelines	768	448
Core clock speed	825 MHz	574 MHz
Transistor count	2,800 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	39.60	32.14
Floating-point performance	1,267 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length	279 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	3200 MHz	3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	102.4 GB/s	144.0 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA		2.0
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		90 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
Dual-link DVI support	+
	Check Price

FirePro R5000 vs Tesla C2050

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares