FirePro S7150 vs Tesla C2050

In this comparison between FirePro S7150 and Tesla C2050 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S7150 will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2050 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro S7150

Tesla C2050

Main Specs

	FirePro S7150	Tesla C2050
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	238 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	3 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI

Tesla C2050 has 58% more power consumption, than FirePro S7150.
FirePro S7150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
FirePro S7150 has 5 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro S7150 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 346 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
FirePro S7150 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2050 is 7 mm longer, than FirePro S7150.
Memory clock speed of FirePro S7150 is 2000 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	35−40	18−20
ultra / 1080p	21−24	10−11
QHD / 1440p	16−18	4−5
4K / 2160p	10−11	4−5
low / 720p	60−65	35−40
medium / 1080p	40−45	21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p	55−60	27−30
ultra / 1080p	45−50	24−27
QHD / 1440p	35−40	8−9
4K / 2160p	18−20	6−7
low / 720p	100−110	60−65
medium / 1080p	60−65	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	−	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro S7150 and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	250−260	220−230
medium / 768p	220−230	190−200
ultra / 1080p	180−190	110−120
QHD / 1440p	110−120	70−75
4K / 2160p	70−75	35−40
high / 768p	210−220	150−160
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 33% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
FirePro S7150 and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
medium / 768p	110−120	100−110
ultra / 1080p	100−110	70−75
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p	45−50	21−24
ultra / 1080p	40−45	20−22
QHD / 1440p	27−30	18−20
4K / 2160p	14−16	7−8
low / 720p	80−85	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	24−27
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Far Cry 5 is 86% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p	60−65	27−30
ultra / 1080p	45−50	21−24
QHD / 1440p	27−30	14−16
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
low / 720p	180−190	110−120
medium / 1080p	110−120	60−65
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Fortnite is 81% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p	60−65	30−35
ultra / 1080p	45−50	21−24
QHD / 1440p	30−35	10−12
4K / 2160p	24−27	−
low / 720p	100−110	60−65
medium / 1080p	65−70	35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 90% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p	140−150	95−100
medium / 768p	120−130	85−90
high / 1080p	70−75	35−40
ultra / 1080p	30−35	14−16
QHD / 1440p	21−24	5−6
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p	24−27	10−12
ultra / 1080p	20−22	9−10
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	2−3
low / 720p	65−70	35−40
medium / 1080p	30−35	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Metro Exodus is 106% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p	130−140	110−120
medium / 1080p	120−130	110−120
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Tesla C2050.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	100−110	65−70
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p	24−27	14−16
ultra / 1080p	16−18	9−10
QHD / 1440p	10−11	0−1
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 720p	65−70	35−40
medium / 1080p	35−40	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p	130−140	65−70
medium / 768p	85−90	40−45
high / 1080p	45−50	21−24
ultra / 1080p	24−27	12−14
4K / 2160p	16−18	7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 106% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	50−55	35−40
high / 768p	60−65	55−60
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7150 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Tesla C2050.

Full Specs

	FirePro S7150	Tesla C2050
Architecture	GCN 3.0	Fermi
Code name	Tonga	GF100
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	1 February 2016	25 July 2011
Pipelines	2048	448
Core clock speed	920 MHz	574 MHz
Transistor count	5,000 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	117.8	32.14
Floating-point performance	3,763 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length	241 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	144.0 GB/s
DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.3	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA		2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		90 Mh/s

FirePro S7150 vs Tesla C2050

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares