FirePro W7170M vs Tesla C2050
When comparing FirePro W7170M and Tesla C2050, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro W7170M and Tesla C2050 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2050
FirePro W7170M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W7170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7170M | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 138% more power consumption, than FirePro W7170M.
- FirePro W7170M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro W7170M has 1 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
- FirePro W7170M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- FirePro W7170M is build with GCN 3 architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W7170M is 149 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- FirePro W7170M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W7170M is 2000 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 12% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Battlefield 5 is 11% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W7170M and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Far Cry 5 is 8% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Fortnite is 12% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Forza Horizon 4 is 6% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Metro Exodus is 6% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 10% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla C2050. |
Full Specs
FirePro W7170M | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | GCN 3 | Fermi |
Code name | Tonga | GF100 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
AppAcceleration | + | |
Check Price |