FireStream 9370 vs Tesla C2050

When choosing between FireStream 9370 and Tesla C2050, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9370 and Tesla C2050.

FireStream 9370

Tesla C2050

Main Specs

	FireStream 9370	Tesla C2050
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	238 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	3 GB
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort	1x DVI

Tesla C2050 has 5% more power consumption, than FireStream 9370.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
FireStream 9370 has 1 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 251 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
FireStream 9370 and Tesla C2050 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
FireStream 9370 is 19 mm longer, than Tesla C2050.
Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 1600 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	12−14	18−20
ultra / 1080p	7−8	10−11
QHD / 1440p	2−3	4−5
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	27−30	35−40
medium / 1080p	16−18	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 38% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p	21−24	27−30
ultra / 1080p	18−20	24−27
QHD / 1440p	4−5	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	45−50	60−65
medium / 1080p	21−24	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 34% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	190−200	220−230
medium / 768p	160−170	190−200
ultra / 1080p	85−90	110−120
QHD / 1440p	45−50	70−75
4K / 2160p	30−33	35−40
high / 768p	120−130	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 23% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	100−110	110−120
medium / 768p	85−90	100−110
ultra / 1080p	55−60	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p	14−16	21−24
ultra / 1080p	14−16	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	5−6	7−8
low / 720p	30−35	45−50
medium / 1080p	16−18	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 41% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p	21−24	27−30
ultra / 1080p	16−18	21−24
QHD / 1440p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	85−90	110−120
medium / 1080p	45−50	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 26% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p	21−24	30−35
ultra / 1080p	16−18	21−24
QHD / 1440p	7−8	10−12
low / 720p	45−50	60−65
medium / 1080p	24−27	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 37% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	75−80	95−100
medium / 768p	65−70	85−90
high / 1080p	24−27	35−40
ultra / 1080p	10−11	14−16
QHD / 1440p	1−2	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p	8−9	10−12
ultra / 1080p	6−7	9−10
4K / 2160p	2−3	2−3
low / 720p	24−27	35−40
medium / 1080p	10−12	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	100−110	110−120
ultra / 1080p	95−100	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 9% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	50−55	65−70
medium / 1080p	21−24	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p	12−14	14−16
ultra / 1080p	9−10	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	35−40
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	45−50	65−70
medium / 768p	27−30	40−45
high / 1080p	16−18	21−24
ultra / 1080p	9−10	12−14
4K / 2160p	7−8	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 36% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	95−100	90−95
medium / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	30−35	35−40
high / 768p	50−55	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than FireStream 9370.

Full Specs

	FireStream 9370	Tesla C2050
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Fermi
Code name	Cypress	GF100
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	23 June 2010	25 July 2011
Pipelines	1600	448
Core clock speed	825 MHz	574 MHz
Transistor count	2,154 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	66.00	32.14
Floating-point performance	2,640.0 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length	267 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	4600 MHz	3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	147.2 GB/s	144.0 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA		2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		90 Mh/s

FireStream 9370 vs Tesla C2050

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares