GeForce 9800M GTS SLI vs Tesla C2050
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce 9800M GTS SLI and Tesla C2050. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce 9800M GTS SLI and Tesla C2050. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla C2050
GeForce 9800M GTS SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 9800M GTS SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 9800M GTS SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce 9800M GTS SLI | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 58% more power consumption, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI.
- GeForce 9800M GTS SLI has 509 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
- GeForce 9800M GTS SLI is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 9800M GTS SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 9800M GTS SLI is 26 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- GeForce 9800M GTS SLI is manufactured by 55/65 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 2200 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 214% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 184% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | − | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 108% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 37% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 86% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 128% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 171% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 126% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 260% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 25% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 155% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 44% more, than GeForce 9800M GTS SLI. |
Full Specs
GeForce 9800M GTS SLI | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | G9x | Fermi |
Code name | NB9E-GT | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 15 July 2008 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 128 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 1508 Million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55/65 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
SLI options | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce 9800M GTS SLI vs GeForce 9800M GT SLI
- GeForce 9800M GTS SLI vs Radeon Vega 10 mobile
- Tesla C2050 vs GeForce 9800M GT SLI
- Tesla C2050 vs Radeon Vega 10 mobile
- GeForce 9800M GTS SLI vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
- GeForce 9800M GTS SLI vs Quadro M2000M
- Tesla C2050 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
- Tesla C2050 vs Quadro M2000M