GeForce 9800M GTX SLI vs Tesla C2050
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 9800M GTX SLI and Tesla C2050, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 9800M GTX SLI stacks up against Tesla C2050, check out specs charts below.
Tesla C2050
GeForce 9800M GTX SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 9800M GTX SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 9800M GTX SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 9800M GTX SLI | Tesla C2050 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 58% more power consumption, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI.
- Tesla C2050 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI.
- GeForce 9800M GTX SLI is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- GeForce 9800M GTX SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 74 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI.
- GeForce 9800M GTX SLI is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 2200 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 69% more, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 40% more, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 34% more, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 71% more, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 54% more, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 73% more, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 55% more, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 87% more, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 26% more, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 53% more, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 76% more, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 14% more, than GeForce 9800M GTX SLI. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 9800M GTX SLI | Tesla C2050 | |
| Architecture | G9x | Fermi |
| Code name | NB9E-GTX | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 15 July 2008 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 224 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3016 Million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| SLI options | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |