GeForce GT 640M vs Tesla C2050
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GT 640M and Tesla C2050. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GT 640M and Tesla C2050. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla C2050
GeForce GT 640M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 640M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 640M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 640M | Tesla C2050 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 32 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3\GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 643% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 640M.
- GeForce GT 640M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2050 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 640M.
- GeForce GT 640M is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 640M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- GeForce GT 640M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 1200 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 640M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 471% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 137% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 120% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 625% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 253% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 528% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 212% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 950% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 666% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| low / 768p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 780% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 67% more, than GeForce GT 640M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 640M | Tesla C2050 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Code name | N13P-GS | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 22 March 2012 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 574 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 645 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
| Floating-point performance | 480.0 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 - 4000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| CUDA cores | 384 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| 3D Blu-Ray | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | 90 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |