GeForce GT 650M SLI vs Tesla C2050
When choosing between GeForce GT 650M SLI and Tesla C2050, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GT 650M SLI and Tesla C2050.
Tesla C2050
GeForce GT 650M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 650M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 650M SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 650M SLI | Tesla C2050 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2x2 GB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 650M SLI.
- GeForce GT 650M SLI is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 650M SLI is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 650M SLI is 216 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- GeForce GT 650M SLI is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 650M SLI is 1000 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than GeForce GT 650M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 47% more, than GeForce GT 650M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GT 650M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 27% more, than GeForce GT 650M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GeForce GT 650M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 21% more, than GeForce GT 650M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than GeForce GT 650M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 35% more, than GeForce GT 650M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than GeForce GT 650M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 37% more, than GeForce GT 650M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GeForce GT 650M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 9% more, than GeForce GT 650M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 13% more, than GeForce GT 650M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than GeForce GT 650M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 50% more, than GeForce GT 650M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GT 650M SLI. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 650M SLI | Tesla C2050 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Code name | N13E-GE | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 22 March 2012 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 790 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 835 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 2x 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |