GeForce GT 750M SLI vs Tesla C2050
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GT 750M SLI and Tesla C2050. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GT 750M SLI and Tesla C2050. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla C2050
GeForce GT 750M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 750M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 750M SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 750M SLI | Tesla C2050 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2x 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 750M SLI.
- GeForce GT 750M SLI is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 750M SLI is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 750M SLI is 393 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- GeForce GT 750M SLI is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 1000 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 750M SLI.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 200−210 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 170−180 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 130−140 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 14% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 26% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 14% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 26% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| GeForce GT 750M SLI and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 17% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than GeForce GT 750M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 750M SLI in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 750M SLI | Tesla C2050 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Code name | N14P-GT | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 April 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 967 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1300 Million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 2x 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 - 5000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |