GeForce GTX 285M SLI vs Tesla C2050
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Tesla C2050, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 285M SLI stacks up against Tesla C2050, check out specs charts below.
Tesla C2050
GeForce GTX 285M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 285M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 285M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 58% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
- Tesla C2050 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI is build with G9x architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 285M SLI is 2 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- GeForce GTX 285M SLI is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 1980 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 200−210 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 170−180 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 130−140 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 285M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 100−105 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 285M SLI | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | G9x | Fermi |
Code name | N10E-GTX | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 2 March 2009 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 256 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 576 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 1508 Million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1020 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |