GeForce GTX 460 768MB vs Tesla C2050
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 460 768MB and Tesla C2050. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 460 768MB and Tesla C2050. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 460 768MB
Tesla C2050
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 768MB | Tesla C2050 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 460 768MB and Tesla C2050 are build with Fermi architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 768MB is 101 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 1200 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 460 768MB. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 768MB | Tesla C2050 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Code name | GF100 | |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | no data | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 336 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 675 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
| DirectX | 11 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |