GeForce GTX 460M SLI vs Tesla C2050
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460M SLI and Tesla C2050 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460M SLI will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2050 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla C2050
GeForce GTX 460M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 460M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 460M SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460M SLI | Tesla C2050 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2x1536 MB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 460M SLI is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 460M SLI and Tesla C2050 are build with Fermi architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460M SLI is 101 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- GeForce GTX 460M SLI and Tesla C2050 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 1750 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 34% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 460M SLI. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460M SLI | Tesla C2050 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Code name | N11E-GS | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 3 September 2010 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 675 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |