GeForce GTX 470M SLI vs Tesla C2050
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 470M SLI and Tesla C2050, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 470M SLI stacks up against Tesla C2050, check out specs charts below.
Tesla C2050
GeForce GTX 470M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 470M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 470M SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 470M SLI | Tesla C2050 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 470M SLI is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 470M SLI and Tesla C2050 are build with Fermi architecture.
- Core clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 39 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 470M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 470M SLI and Tesla C2050 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 1750 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 470M SLI.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 470M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 470M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 470M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 470M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 470M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 470M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 470M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 470M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 470M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 470M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 470M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 470M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 470M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 470M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 470M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 470M SLI in World of Tanks is 4% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 470M SLI | Tesla C2050 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Code name | N11E-GT | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 November 2010 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 576 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 535 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |