GeForce GTX 480M SLI vs Tesla C2050
When comparing GeForce GTX 480M SLI and Tesla C2050, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 480M SLI and Tesla C2050 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2050
GeForce GTX 480M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 480M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 480M SLI here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 480M SLI | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 138% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 480M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 480M SLI has 1 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
- GeForce GTX 480M SLI is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 480M SLI and Tesla C2050 are build with Fermi architecture.
- Core clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 149 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 480M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 480M SLI and Tesla C2050 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 1800 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 480M SLI.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 480M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 480M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 480M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 480M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 480M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 480M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 480M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 480M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 480M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 480M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 480M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 480M SLI. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 480M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 480M SLI. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 480M SLI in World of Tanks is 4% more, than Tesla C2050. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 480M SLI | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
Code name | N11E-GTX-A3 | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 25 May 2010 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 704 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 425 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 6000 Million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |