GeForce GTX 560M vs Tesla C2050
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 560M and Tesla C2050 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 560M will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2050 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla C2050
GeForce GTX 560M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 560M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 560M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 560M | Tesla C2050 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 217% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 560M.
- GeForce GTX 560M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 560M has 1533 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
- GeForce GTX 560M is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 560M and Tesla C2050 are build with Fermi architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 560M is 201 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- GeForce GTX 560M and Tesla C2050 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 1750 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 560M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 184% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 95% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 70% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 193% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 5−6 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 117% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 260% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 153% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 180% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 233% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 47% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 560M | Tesla C2050 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Code name | N12E-GS | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 30 May 2011 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 24.8 billion/sec | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 595.2 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| CUDA cores | 192 | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| 3D Blu-Ray | + | |
| 3D Gaming | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 44 Mh/s | 90 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |