GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs Tesla C2050
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Tesla C2050, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost stacks up against Tesla C2050, check out specs charts below.
Tesla C2050
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Tesla C2050
Power consumption (TDP)
134 Watt
238 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
One 6-pin
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
3 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
1x DVI
Check Price
Tesla C2050 has 77% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2050 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is 406 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2050 is 239 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 2994 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
18−20
ultra / 1080p
9−10
10−11
QHD / 1440p
3−4
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
21−24
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
27−30
27−30
ultra / 1080p
21−24
24−27
QHD / 1440p
6−7
8−9
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
55−60
60−65
medium / 1080p
30−33
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
210−220
220−230
medium / 768p
180−190
190−200
ultra / 1080p
100−110
110−120
QHD / 1440p
60−65
70−75
4K / 2160p
30−35
35−40
high / 768p
150−160
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
45−50
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
medium / 768p
100−110
100−110
ultra / 1080p
70−75
70−75
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Dota 2.
high / 1080p
20−22
21−24
ultra / 1080p
18−20
20−22
QHD / 1440p
18−20
18−20
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
low / 720p
40−45
45−50
medium / 1080p
21−24
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
27−30
27−30
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
QHD / 1440p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
100−110
110−120
medium / 1080p
60−65
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
27−30
30−35
ultra / 1080p
21−24
21−24
QHD / 1440p
10−11
10−12
low / 720p
55−60
60−65
medium / 1080p
30−35
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
90−95
95−100
medium / 768p
80−85
85−90
high / 1080p
30−35
35−40
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
QHD / 1440p
3−4
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
10−11
10−12
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
4K / 2160p
1−2
2−3
low / 720p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
14−16
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
110−120
110−120
medium / 1080p
110−120
110−120
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
65−70
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
high / 1080p
12−14
14−16
ultra / 1080p
9−10
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
60−65
65−70
medium / 768p
35−40
40−45
high / 1080p
21−24
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
35−40
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Tesla C2050
Architecture
Kepler
Fermi
Code name
GK106
GF100
Type
Desktop
Workstation
Release date
26 March 2013
25 July 2011
Pipelines
768
448
Core clock speed
980 MHz
574 MHz
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
Transistor count
2,540 million
3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
62.7 billion/sec
32.14
Floating-point performance
1,585 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
9.5" (24.1 cm)
248 mm
Memory bus width
192 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
6.0 GB/s
3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
144.2 GB/s
144.0 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
N/A
CUDA
+
2.0
CUDA cores
768
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0
Height
4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
4 Displays
HDMI
+
HDCP
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
3D Blu-Ray
+
3D Gaming
+
3D Vision
+
3D Vision Live
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
54 Mh/s
90 Mh/s
Check Price
