GeForce GTX 670MX vs Tesla C2050
When comparing GeForce GTX 670MX and Tesla C2050, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 670MX and Tesla C2050 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2050
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 670MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670MX here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 670MX | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 217% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
- GeForce GTX 670MX is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 670MX and Tesla C2050 have maximum RAM of 3 GB.
- GeForce GTX 670MX is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 670MX is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 670MX is 26 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- GeForce GTX 670MX is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 1600 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 95−100 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 54% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 49% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 72% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 106% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 114% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 87% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 670MX | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | N13E-GR | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 October 2012 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 960 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.0 billion/sec | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,154 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 67.2 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
CUDA cores | 960 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |