GeForce GTX 670MX SLI vs Tesla C2050
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 670MX SLI and Tesla C2050. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 670MX SLI and Tesla C2050. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla C2050
GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670MX SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 670MX SLI | Tesla C2050 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 58% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 670MX SLI.
- GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is 26 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 200 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670MX SLI.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Battlefield 5 is 29% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 670MX SLI and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 210−220 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 15% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Far Cry 5 is 26% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Fortnite is 25% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Forza Horizon 4 is 21% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 100−105 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Metro Exodus is 33% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 26% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 670MX SLI | Tesla C2050 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Code name | N13E-GR | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 October 2012 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 1920 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5080 Million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 2x 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 11, Shader 5.1 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| SLI options | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |