GeForce GTX 775M vs Tesla C2050
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 775M and Tesla C2050 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 775M will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2050 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla C2050
GeForce GTX 775M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 775M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 775M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 775M | Tesla C2050 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 138% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 775M.
- GeForce GTX 775M has 1 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
- GeForce GTX 775M is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 775M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 775M is 145 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- GeForce GTX 775M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 775M is 600 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 18% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 775M and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Dota 2 is 10% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Far Cry 5 is 21% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Fortnite is 22% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Grand Theft Auto V is 12% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 20% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 775M in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 775M | Tesla C2050 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Code name | N13E-GTX-A2 | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 24 September 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 1344 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 719 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3540 Million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| SLI options | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |