GeForce GTX 780M vs Tesla C2050
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 780M and Tesla C2050, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 780M stacks up against Tesla C2050, check out specs charts below.
Tesla C2050
GeForce GTX 780M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 780M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 780M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 780M | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 122 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 95% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 780M.
- GeForce GTX 780M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 780M has 1 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
- GeForce GTX 780M is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 780M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 780M is 249 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- GeForce GTX 780M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 500 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 780M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 18% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Battlefield 5 is 14% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 780M and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Far Cry 5 is 13% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Fortnite is 12% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Forza Horizon 4 is 12% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Metro Exodus is 13% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 10% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 13% more, than Tesla C2050. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 780M in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla C2050. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 780M | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | N14E-GTX | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 30 May 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 823 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 797 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 102.0 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 2,448 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 82 Mh/s | 90 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |