GeForce GTX 950A vs Tesla C2050

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 950A and Tesla C2050, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 950A stacks up against Tesla C2050, check out specs charts below.

GeForce GTX 950A

Tesla C2050

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 950A	Tesla C2050
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	238 Watt
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	3 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI

Tesla C2050 has 217% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 950A.
GeForce GTX 950A is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2050 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 950A.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 950A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 950A is 419 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
GeForce GTX 950A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 998 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 950A.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	12−14	18−20
ultra / 1080p	7−8	10−11
QHD / 1440p	2−3	4−5
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	24−27	35−40
medium / 1080p	14−16	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 950A.
high / 1080p	20−22	27−30
ultra / 1080p	16−18	24−27
QHD / 1440p	3−4	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	40−45	60−65
medium / 1080p	21−24	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 47% more, than GeForce GTX 950A.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 950A.
low / 768p	190−200	220−230
medium / 768p	150−160	190−200
ultra / 1080p	80−85	110−120
QHD / 1440p	45−50	70−75
4K / 2160p	30−33	35−40
high / 768p	120−130	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 950A.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	30−35	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 950A.
low / 768p	100−110	110−120
medium / 768p	80−85	100−110
ultra / 1080p	50−55	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 950A.
high / 1080p	14−16	21−24
ultra / 1080p	12−14	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	5−6	7−8
low / 720p	30−35	45−50
medium / 1080p	14−16	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 950A.
high / 1080p	21−24	27−30
ultra / 1080p	16−18	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	14−16
low / 720p	85−90	110−120
medium / 1080p	40−45	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 950A.
high / 1080p	21−24	30−35
ultra / 1080p	16−18	21−24
QHD / 1440p	6−7	10−12
low / 720p	40−45	60−65
medium / 1080p	24−27	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 950A.
low / 768p	75−80	95−100
medium / 768p	65−70	85−90
high / 1080p	24−27	35−40
ultra / 1080p	10−11	14−16
QHD / 1440p	1−2	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 950A.
high / 1080p	8−9	10−12
ultra / 1080p	6−7	9−10
4K / 2160p	2−3	2−3
low / 720p	21−24	35−40
medium / 1080p	10−11	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 950A.
low / 768p	100−110	110−120
ultra / 1080p	95−100	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 950A.
high / 1080p	20−22	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	45−50	65−70
medium / 1080p	21−24	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 950A.
high / 1080p	12−14	14−16
ultra / 1080p	9−10	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	35−40
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 950A.
low / 768p	45−50	65−70
medium / 768p	27−30	40−45
high / 1080p	14−16	21−24
ultra / 1080p	9−10	12−14
4K / 2160p	7−8	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 950A.
low / 768p	95−100	90−95
medium / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	30−33	35−40
high / 768p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 950A.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 950A	Tesla C2050
Architecture	Maxwell	Fermi
Code name	GM107	GF100
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	13 March 2015	25 July 2011
Pipelines	640	448
Core clock speed	993 MHz	574 MHz
Boost Clock	1124 MHz
Transistor count	1,870 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	44.96	32.14
Floating-point performance	1,271 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length		248 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	2002 MHz	3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	32.03 GB/s	144.0 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	5.0	2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		90 Mh/s

GeForce GTX 950A vs Tesla C2050

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares