GRID K260Q vs Tesla C2050

When comparing GRID K260Q and Tesla C2050, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K260Q and Tesla C2050 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GRID K260Q

Tesla C2050

Main Specs

	GRID K260Q	Tesla C2050
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	238 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	3 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI

Tesla C2050 has 5% more power consumption, than GRID K260Q.
GRID K260Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2050 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of GRID K260Q is 171 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
GRID K260Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 2000 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	18−20
ultra / 1080p	9−10	10−11
QHD / 1440p	3−4	4−5
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	30−35	35−40
medium / 1080p	18−20	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	27−30
ultra / 1080p	21−24	24−27
QHD / 1440p	7−8	8−9
4K / 2160p	5−6	6−7
low / 720p	50−55	60−65
medium / 1080p	27−30	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 17% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	210−220	220−230
medium / 768p	180−190	190−200
ultra / 1080p	95−100	110−120
QHD / 1440p	50−55	70−75
4K / 2160p	30−33	35−40
high / 768p	140−150	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
medium / 768p	90−95	100−110
ultra / 1080p	60−65	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	18−20	21−24
ultra / 1080p	16−18	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	6−7	7−8
low / 720p	35−40	45−50
medium / 1080p	18−20	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 26% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	27−30
ultra / 1080p	18−20	21−24
QHD / 1440p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	95−100	110−120
medium / 1080p	50−55	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 14% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	30−35
ultra / 1080p	20−22	21−24
QHD / 1440p	9−10	10−12
low / 720p	50−55	60−65
medium / 1080p	27−30	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 22% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	85−90	95−100
medium / 768p	75−80	85−90
high / 1080p	30−33	35−40
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
QHD / 1440p	3−4	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 14% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	9−10	10−12
ultra / 1080p	7−8	9−10
4K / 2160p	2−3	2−3
low / 720p	27−30	35−40
medium / 1080p	12−14	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GRID K260Q.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	65−70
medium / 1080p	24−27	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p	14−16	14−16
ultra / 1080p	9−10	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	35−40
medium / 1080p	16−18	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 17% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	55−60	65−70
medium / 768p	30−35	40−45
high / 1080p	18−20	21−24
ultra / 1080p	10−12	12−14
4K / 2160p	8−9	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 20% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	35−40
high / 768p	50−55	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Tesla C2050.

Full Specs

	GRID K260Q	Tesla C2050
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi
Code name	GK104	GF100
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	28 June 2013	25 July 2011
Pipelines	1536	448
Core clock speed	745 MHz	574 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	32.14
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length		248 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	144.0 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	3.0	2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		90 Mh/s

GRID K260Q vs Tesla C2050

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares