GRID M10 8Q vs Tesla C2050

In this comparison between GRID M10 8Q and Tesla C2050 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M10 8Q will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2050 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GRID M10 8Q

Tesla C2050

Main Specs

	GRID M10 8Q	Tesla C2050
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	238 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	3 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI

Tesla C2050 has 5% more power consumption, than GRID M10 8Q.
GRID M10 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
GRID M10 8Q has 5 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID M10 8Q is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 459 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
GRID M10 8Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
GRID M10 8Q is 19 mm longer, than Tesla C2050.
Memory clock speed of GRID M10 8Q is 2200 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	12−14	18−20
ultra / 1080p	8−9	10−11
QHD / 1440p	2−3	4−5
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	27−30	35−40
medium / 1080p	16−18	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 38% more, than GRID M10 8Q.
high / 1080p	21−24	27−30
ultra / 1080p	18−20	24−27
QHD / 1440p	4−5	8−9
4K / 2160p	4−5	6−7
low / 720p	45−50	60−65
medium / 1080p	21−24	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 35% more, than GRID M10 8Q.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID M10 8Q.
low / 768p	190−200	220−230
medium / 768p	160−170	190−200
ultra / 1080p	85−90	110−120
QHD / 1440p	50−55	70−75
4K / 2160p	30−33	35−40
high / 768p	120−130	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 22% more, than GRID M10 8Q.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than GRID M10 8Q.
low / 768p	100−110	110−120
medium / 768p	85−90	100−110
ultra / 1080p	55−60	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than GRID M10 8Q.
high / 1080p	14−16	21−24
ultra / 1080p	14−16	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	5−6	7−8
low / 720p	35−40	45−50
medium / 1080p	16−18	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than GRID M10 8Q.
high / 1080p	21−24	27−30
ultra / 1080p	16−18	21−24
QHD / 1440p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	90−95	110−120
medium / 1080p	45−50	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 23% more, than GRID M10 8Q.
high / 1080p	21−24	30−35
ultra / 1080p	18−20	21−24
QHD / 1440p	7−8	10−12
low / 720p	45−50	60−65
medium / 1080p	24−27	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 37% more, than GRID M10 8Q.
low / 768p	75−80	95−100
medium / 768p	70−75	85−90
high / 1080p	24−27	35−40
ultra / 1080p	10−12	14−16
QHD / 1440p	1−2	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 29% more, than GRID M10 8Q.
high / 1080p	8−9	10−12
ultra / 1080p	6−7	9−10
4K / 2160p	2−3	2−3
low / 720p	24−27	35−40
medium / 1080p	10−12	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GRID M10 8Q.
low / 768p	100−110	110−120
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 9% more, than GRID M10 8Q.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	50−55	65−70
medium / 1080p	21−24	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than GRID M10 8Q.
high / 1080p	12−14	14−16
ultra / 1080p	9−10	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	35−40
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than GRID M10 8Q.
low / 768p	45−50	65−70
medium / 768p	30−33	40−45
high / 1080p	16−18	21−24
ultra / 1080p	10−11	12−14
4K / 2160p	7−8	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 36% more, than GRID M10 8Q.
low / 768p	95−100	90−95
medium / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	30−35	35−40
high / 768p	50−55	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GRID M10 8Q.

Full Specs

	GRID M10 8Q	Tesla C2050
Architecture	Maxwell	Fermi
Code name	GM107	GF100
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	18 May 2016	25 July 2011
Pipelines	640	448
Core clock speed	1033 MHz	574 MHz
Boost Clock	1306 MHz
Transistor count	1,870 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	52.24	32.14
Floating-point performance	1,672 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length	267 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	5200 MHz	3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	83.2 GB/s	144.0 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	5.0	2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		90 Mh/s

GRID M10 8Q vs Tesla C2050

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares