GRID M60 2Q vs Tesla C2050

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID M60 2Q and Tesla C2050. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID M60 2Q and Tesla C2050. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

GRID M60 2Q

Tesla C2050

Main Specs

	GRID M60 2Q	Tesla C2050
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	238 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	3 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI

Tesla C2050 has 5% more power consumption, than GRID M60 2Q.
GRID M60 2Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2050 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID M60 2Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID M60 2Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 17 MHz higher, than GRID M60 2Q.
GRID M60 2Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
GRID M60 2Q is 19 mm longer, than Tesla C2050.
Memory clock speed of GRID M60 2Q is 2012 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	35−40	18−20
ultra / 1080p	21−24	10−11
QHD / 1440p	16−18	4−5
4K / 2160p	10−11	4−5
low / 720p	60−65	35−40
medium / 1080p	40−45	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p	55−60	27−30
ultra / 1080p	45−50	24−27
QHD / 1440p	35−40	8−9
4K / 2160p	18−20	6−7
low / 720p	100−110	60−65
medium / 1080p	60−65	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	−	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID M60 2Q and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	250−260	220−230
medium / 768p	220−230	190−200
ultra / 1080p	180−190	110−120
QHD / 1440p	110−120	70−75
4K / 2160p	70−75	35−40
high / 768p	210−220	150−160
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 33% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
GRID M60 2Q and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
medium / 768p	110−120	100−110
ultra / 1080p	100−110	70−75
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p	45−50	21−24
ultra / 1080p	40−45	20−22
QHD / 1440p	27−30	18−20
4K / 2160p	14−16	7−8
low / 720p	80−85	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Far Cry 5 is 86% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p	60−65	27−30
ultra / 1080p	45−50	21−24
QHD / 1440p	27−30	14−16
4K / 2160p	27−30	−
low / 720p	180−190	110−120
medium / 1080p	110−120	60−65
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Fortnite is 81% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p	60−65	30−35
ultra / 1080p	45−50	21−24
QHD / 1440p	30−35	10−12
4K / 2160p	24−27	−
low / 720p	100−110	60−65
medium / 1080p	65−70	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 90% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p	140−150	95−100
medium / 768p	120−130	85−90
high / 1080p	70−75	35−40
ultra / 1080p	30−35	14−16
QHD / 1440p	21−24	5−6
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p	24−27	10−12
ultra / 1080p	20−22	9−10
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	2−3
low / 720p	65−70	35−40
medium / 1080p	30−35	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Metro Exodus is 106% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p	130−140	110−120
medium / 1080p	120−130	110−120
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Minecraft is 13% more, than Tesla C2050.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	100−110	65−70
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p	24−27	14−16
ultra / 1080p	16−18	9−10
QHD / 1440p	10−11	0−1
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
low / 720p	65−70	35−40
medium / 1080p	35−40	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 80% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p	130−140	65−70
medium / 768p	85−90	40−45
high / 1080p	45−50	21−24
ultra / 1080p	24−27	12−14
4K / 2160p	16−18	7−8
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 106% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	50−55	35−40
high / 768p	60−65	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Tesla C2050.

Full Specs

	GRID M60 2Q	Tesla C2050
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Fermi
Code name	GM204	GF100
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	30 August 2015	25 July 2011
Pipelines	2048	448
Core clock speed	557 MHz	574 MHz
Boost Clock	1178 MHz
Transistor count	5,200 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	150.8	32.14
Floating-point performance	4,833 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length	267 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.4 GB/s	144.0 GB/s
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	5.2	2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		90 Mh/s

GRID M60 2Q vs Tesla C2050

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares