HD Graphics 4400 vs Tesla C2050
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing HD Graphics 4400 and Tesla C2050. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between HD Graphics 4400 and Tesla C2050. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla C2050
HD Graphics 4400 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 4400 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 4400 here:
Main Specs
| HD Graphics 4400 | Tesla C2050 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 1090% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 4400.
- HD Graphics 4400 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- HD Graphics 4400 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- HD Graphics 4400 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 374 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 4400.
- HD Graphics 4400 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1750% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 18−20 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 514% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 37% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 205% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 422% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 410% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 43% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 330% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than HD Graphics 4400. | ||
Full Specs
| HD Graphics 4400 | Tesla C2050 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | Fermi |
| Code name | Haswell GT2 | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 June 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 20 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 392 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 22.00 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 46 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |