HD Graphics 630 vs Tesla C2050
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between HD Graphics 630 and Tesla C2050, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the HD Graphics 630 stacks up against Tesla C2050, check out specs charts below.
HD Graphics 630
Tesla C2050
Main Specs
HD Graphics 630 | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
- Tesla C2050 has 1486% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 630.
- HD Graphics 630 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- HD Graphics 630 has 61 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- HD Graphics 630 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 274 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 630.
- HD Graphics 630 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 270% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | − | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 108% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 79% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 383% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 152% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 280% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 163% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 425% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 32% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 233% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 275% more, than HD Graphics 630. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than HD Graphics 630. |
Full Specs
HD Graphics 630 | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | Fermi |
Code name | Kaby-Lake-H-GT2 | GF100 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 January 2017 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 24 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 26.40 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |