HD Graphics P630 vs Tesla C2050
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing HD Graphics P630 and Tesla C2050. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between HD Graphics P630 and Tesla C2050. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
HD Graphics P630
Tesla C2050
Main Specs
HD Graphics P630 | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1740 MB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
- Tesla C2050 has 1486% more power consumption, than HD Graphics P630.
- HD Graphics P630 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- HD Graphics P630 has 1737 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- HD Graphics P630 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- HD Graphics P630 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 270% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | − | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 108% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 79% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 383% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 152% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 280% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 163% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 425% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 32% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 233% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 275% more, than HD Graphics P630. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than HD Graphics P630. |
Full Specs
HD Graphics P630 | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | Fermi |
Code name | Kaby-Lake-H-GT2 | GF100 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 5 August 2016 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 24 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 574 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 26.40 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |