Iris Graphics 5100 vs Tesla C2050
In this comparison between Iris Graphics 5100 and Tesla C2050 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Graphics 5100 will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2050 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla C2050
Iris Graphics 5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 5100 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Graphics 5100 | Tesla C2050 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 693% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 374 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- Iris Graphics 5100 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 270% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 104% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 90% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 380% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 166% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 163% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 425% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 25% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 187% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 328% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 47% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Graphics 5100 | Tesla C2050 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | Fermi |
| Code name | Haswell GT3 | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 June 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 40 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,300 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.00 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |