Iris Graphics 6100 vs Tesla C2050
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Graphics 6100 and Tesla C2050, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Graphics 6100 stacks up against Tesla C2050, check out specs charts below.
Tesla C2050
Iris Graphics 6100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 6100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 6100 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Graphics 6100 | Tesla C2050 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 1486% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 274 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 6100.
- Iris Graphics 6100 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 263% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 130% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 37% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 102% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 242% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 159% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 216% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 156% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 260% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 25% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 73% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 187% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 227% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 51% more, than Iris Graphics 6100. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Graphics 6100 | Tesla C2050 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell | Fermi |
| Code name | Broadwell GT3 | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 5 January 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 48 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 52.80 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.80 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |