Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Tesla C2050

    If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Tesla C2050, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Plus Graphics 645 stacks up against Tesla C2050, check out specs charts below.
    Iris Plus Graphics 645 Check Price
    Tesla C2050

    Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a Laptop Graphics Card

    Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:

    Iris Plus Graphics 645 Laptops

    Main Specs

      Iris Plus Graphics 645 Tesla C2050
    Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 238 Watt
    Interface PCIe 3.0 x1 PCIe 2.0 x16
    Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
    Memory type DDR3/DDR4 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 3 GB
    Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI
      Check Price
    • Tesla C2050 has 1486% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 645 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 645 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 645 is build with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
    • Core clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 274 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
    • Iris Plus Graphics 645 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 4−5 18−20
    ultra / 1080p 2−3 10−11
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 4−5
    4K / 2160p − 4−5
    low / 720p 12−14 35−40
    medium / 1080p 5−6 21−24
    The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.

    Full Specs

      Iris Plus Graphics 645 Tesla C2050
    Architecture Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake Fermi
    Code name Kaby Lake GT3e GF100
    Type Laptop Workstation
    Release date 10 July 2019 25 July 2011
    Pipelines 48 448
    Core clock speed 300 MHz 574 MHz
    Boost Clock 1150 MHz
    Transistor count 3,100 million
    Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 40 nm
    Texture fill rate 50.40 32.14
    Floating-point performance 1,030.4 gflops
    Length 248 mm
    Memory bus width 384 Bit
    Memory clock speed 3000 MHz
    Memory bandwidth 144.0 GB/s
    Shared memory +
    DirectX 12 (12_1) 12 (11_0)
    Shader Model 6.4 5.1
    OpenGL 4.6 4.6
    OpenCL 2.1 1.1
    Vulkan 1.1.103 N/A
    CUDA 2.0
    Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 90 Mh/s
    Quick Sync +
      Check Price

    Similar compares