Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Tesla C2050
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Tesla C2050. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Iris Pro Graphics P580 and Tesla C2050. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla C2050
Iris Pro Graphics P580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics P580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics P580 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 1486% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 has 61 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 224 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics P580.
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 69% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 40% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 34% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 84% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 58% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 83% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 55% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 87% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 26% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 53% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 76% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 16% more, than Iris Pro Graphics P580. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | Fermi |
Code name | Skylake GT4e | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 September 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 72 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 189 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 75.60 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.97 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Tesla C2050 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 Ryzen 2000
- Tesla C2050 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
- Iris Pro Graphics P580 vs Quadro M2000M
- Tesla C2050 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
- Tesla C2050 vs Quadro M2000M