Mobility Radeon HD 4870 vs Tesla C2050
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Mobility Radeon HD 4870 and Tesla C2050, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Mobility Radeon HD 4870 stacks up against Tesla C2050, check out specs charts below.
Tesla C2050
Mobility Radeon HD 4870 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Mobility Radeon HD 4870 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Mobility Radeon HD 4870 here:
Main Specs
Mobility Radeon HD 4870 | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla C2050 has 2 GB more memory, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870.
- Mobility Radeon HD 4870 is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- Mobility Radeon HD 4870 is build with Terascale 1 architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 24 MHz higher, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870.
- Mobility Radeon HD 4870 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 2112 MHz higher, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 144% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 146% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 75% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 30% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 61% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 103% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 153% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 103% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 157% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 21% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 120% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
low / 768p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 130% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Mobility Radeon HD 4870. |
Full Specs
Mobility Radeon HD 4870 | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | Terascale 1 | Fermi |
Code name | M98-XT | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 9 January 2009 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 800 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 956 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 22.00 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 880.0 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 888 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 56.83 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |