NVS 810 vs Tesla C2050

When comparing NVS 810 and Tesla C2050, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between NVS 810 and Tesla C2050 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

NVS 810 Check Price

Tesla C2050

Main Specs

	NVS 810	Tesla C2050
Power consumption (TDP)	68 Watt	238 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	3 GB
Display Connectors	8x mini-DisplayPort	1x DVI
	Check Price

Tesla C2050 has 250% more power consumption, than NVS 810.
NVS 810 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2050 has 1 GB more memory, than NVS 810.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
NVS 810 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of NVS 810 is 328 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
NVS 810 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2050 is 50 mm longer, than NVS 810.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 1200 MHz higher, than NVS 810.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	2−3	18−20
ultra / 1080p	1−2	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	12−14	35−40
medium / 1080p	4−5	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	5−6	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	16−18	60−65
medium / 1080p	6−7	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 344% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	40−45	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	120−130	220−230
medium / 768p	95−100	190−200
ultra / 1080p	40−45	110−120
QHD / 1440p	21−24	70−75
4K / 2160p	16−18	35−40
high / 768p	65−70	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 114% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	65−70	60−65
ultra / 1080p	20−22	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	80−85	110−120
medium / 768p	45−50	100−110
ultra / 1080p	21−24	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 94% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	2−3	21−24
ultra / 1080p	2−3	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	2−3	7−8
low / 720p	10−12	45−50
medium / 1080p	4−5	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	10−11	27−30
ultra / 1080p	5−6	21−24
QHD / 1440p	4−5	14−16
low / 720p	50−55	110−120
medium / 1080p	10−12	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 200% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	5−6	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	3−4	10−12
4K / 2160p	2−3	−
low / 720p	18−20	60−65
medium / 1080p	8−9	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 288% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	45−50	95−100
medium / 768p	−	85−90
high / 1080p	4−5	35−40
ultra / 1080p	2−3	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
medium / 720p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 177% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	2−3	10−12
ultra / 1080p	0−1	9−10
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	4−5	35−40
medium / 1080p	3−4	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	90−95	110−120
high / 1080p	80−85	−
ultra / 1080p	70−75	−
medium / 1080p	85−90	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 27% more, than NVS 810.
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	27−30	65−70
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than NVS 810.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	6−7	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 516% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	10−11	65−70
medium / 768p	8−9	40−45
high / 1080p	4−5	21−24
ultra / 1080p	4−5	12−14
4K / 2160p	1−2	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 500% more, than NVS 810.
low / 768p	70−75	90−95
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	35−40
high / 768p	30−35	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than NVS 810.

Full Specs

	NVS 810	Tesla C2050
Architecture	Maxwell	Fermi
Code name	GM107	GF100
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	4 November 2015	25 July 2011
Pipelines	512	448
Core clock speed	902 MHz	574 MHz
Boost Clock	1033 MHz
Transistor count	1,870 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	33.06	32.14
Floating-point performance	2x 1,058 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length	198 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	64 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	144.0 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	5.0	2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		90 Mh/s
	Check Price

NVS 810 vs Tesla C2050

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares