P106 090 vs Tesla C2050

When choosing between P106 090 and Tesla C2050, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between P106 090 and Tesla C2050.

P106 090

Tesla C2050

Main Specs

	P106 090	Tesla C2050
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	238 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	3 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI

Tesla C2050 has 217% more power consumption, than P106 090.
P106 090 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
P106 090 and Tesla C2050 have maximum RAM of 3 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
P106 090 is build with Pascal architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of P106 090 is 780 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
P106 090 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
P106 090 is 2 mm longer, than Tesla C2050.
Memory clock speed of P106 090 is 5008 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	18−20
ultra / 1080p	9−10	10−11
QHD / 1440p	3−4	4−5
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	30−35	35−40
medium / 1080p	18−20	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than P106 090.
high / 1080p	24−27	27−30
ultra / 1080p	20−22	24−27
QHD / 1440p	7−8	8−9
4K / 2160p	5−6	6−7
low / 720p	50−55	60−65
medium / 1080p	24−27	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than P106 090.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than P106 090.
low / 768p	200−210	220−230
medium / 768p	170−180	190−200
ultra / 1080p	95−100	110−120
QHD / 1440p	50−55	70−75
4K / 2160p	30−33	35−40
high / 768p	140−150	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than P106 090.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than P106 090.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
medium / 768p	90−95	100−110
ultra / 1080p	60−65	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than P106 090.
high / 1080p	16−18	21−24
ultra / 1080p	16−18	20−22
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	6−7	7−8
low / 720p	35−40	45−50
medium / 1080p	18−20	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 26% more, than P106 090.
high / 1080p	24−27	27−30
ultra / 1080p	18−20	21−24
QHD / 1440p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	95−100	110−120
medium / 1080p	50−55	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 14% more, than P106 090.
high / 1080p	24−27	30−35
ultra / 1080p	20−22	21−24
QHD / 1440p	9−10	10−12
low / 720p	50−55	60−65
medium / 1080p	27−30	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 22% more, than P106 090.
low / 768p	85−90	95−100
medium / 768p	75−80	85−90
high / 1080p	27−30	35−40
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
QHD / 1440p	3−4	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 14% more, than P106 090.
high / 1080p	9−10	10−12
ultra / 1080p	7−8	9−10
4K / 2160p	2−3	2−3
low / 720p	27−30	35−40
medium / 1080p	12−14	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than P106 090.
low / 768p	110−120	110−120
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 4% more, than P106 090.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	65−70
medium / 1080p	24−27	18−20
P106 090 and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS.
high / 1080p	14−16	14−16
ultra / 1080p	9−10	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	35−40
medium / 1080p	16−18	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 17% more, than P106 090.
low / 768p	50−55	65−70
medium / 768p	30−35	40−45
high / 1080p	18−20	21−24
ultra / 1080p	10−12	12−14
4K / 2160p	8−9	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than P106 090.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	35−40
high / 768p	50−55	55−60
The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Tesla C2050.

Full Specs

	P106 090	Tesla C2050
Architecture	Pascal	Fermi
Code name	GP106	GF100
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	31 July 2017	25 July 2011
Pipelines	768	448
Core clock speed	1354 MHz	574 MHz
Boost Clock	1531 MHz
Transistor count	4,400 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	73.49	32.14
Floating-point performance	2,352 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length	250 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	192 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	8008 MHz	3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.2 GB/s	144.0 GB/s
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	6.1	2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		90 Mh/s

P106 090 vs Tesla C2050

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares