Quadro 4000 vs Tesla C2050
In this comparison between Quadro 4000 and Tesla C2050 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 4000 will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2050 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla C2050
Main Specs
Quadro 4000
Tesla C2050
Power consumption (TDP)
142 Watt
238 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
3 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
1x DVI
Check Price
Tesla C2050 has 67% more power consumption, than Quadro 4000.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Tesla C2050 has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro 4000.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro 4000 and Tesla C2050 are build with Fermi architecture.
Core clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 99 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000.
Quadro 4000 and Tesla C2050 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
Tesla C2050 is 7 mm longer, than Quadro 4000.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 192 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
18−20
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
16−18
35−40
medium / 1080p
8−9
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 144% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p
12−14
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−11
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
24−27
60−65
medium / 1080p
12−14
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 146% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p
130−140
220−230
medium / 768p
110−120
190−200
ultra / 1080p
50−55
110−120
QHD / 1440p
27−30
70−75
4K / 2160p
27−30
35−40
high / 768p
80−85
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 82% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p
80−85
110−120
medium / 768p
60−65
100−110
ultra / 1080p
30−35
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 64% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p
8−9
21−24
ultra / 1080p
7−8
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
3−4
7−8
low / 720p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
9−10
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p
14−16
27−30
ultra / 1080p
10−11
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
110−120
medium / 1080p
21−24
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 111% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p
12−14
30−35
ultra / 1080p
10−12
21−24
QHD / 1440p
1−2
10−12
low / 720p
24−27
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 153% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p
50−55
95−100
medium / 768p
45−50
85−90
high / 1080p
12−14
35−40
ultra / 1080p
6−7
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 103% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p
5−6
10−12
ultra / 1080p
3−4
9−10
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
6−7
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 157% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p
95−100
110−120
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 21% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
65−70
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Quadro 4000.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
10−12
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 120% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p
24−27
65−70
medium / 768p
16−18
40−45
high / 1080p
9−10
21−24
ultra / 1080p
6−7
12−14
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 130% more, than Quadro 4000.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
35−40
high / 768p
35−40
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 31% more, than Quadro 4000.
Full Specs
Quadro 4000
Tesla C2050
Architecture
Fermi
Fermi
Code name
GF100
GF100
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
2 November 2010
25 July 2011
Pipelines
256
448
Core clock speed
475 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
3,100 million
3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
15.20
32.14
Floating-point performance
486.4 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
241 mm
248 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
2808 MHz
3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
89.86 GB/s
144.0 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
CUDA
2.0
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
44 Mh/s
90 Mh/s
Check Price