Quadro 4000M vs Tesla C2050
When comparing Quadro 4000M and Tesla C2050, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 4000M and Tesla C2050 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2050
Quadro 4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 4000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 4000M | Tesla C2050 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 138% more power consumption, than Quadro 4000M.
- Quadro 4000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2050 has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro 4000M.
- Quadro 4000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- Quadro 4000M and Tesla C2050 are build with Fermi architecture.
- Core clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 99 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
- Quadro 4000M and Tesla C2050 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 1800 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 270% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 108% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 79% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 314% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 152% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 245% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 163% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 425% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 233% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 275% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 4000M | Tesla C2050 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Code name | Fermi | GF100 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 22 February 2011 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 336 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 475 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 26.60 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 638.4 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 82 Mh/s | 90 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |