Quadro K2200M vs Tesla C2050

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro K2200M and Tesla C2050. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro K2200M and Tesla C2050. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

Quadro K2200M

Tesla C2050

Main Specs

	Quadro K2200M	Tesla C2050
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	238 Watt
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	3 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI

Tesla C2050 has 266% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
Quadro K2200M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Tesla C2050 has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro K2200M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 93 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Quadro K2200M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 2012 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	20−22	18−20
ultra / 1080p	12−14	10−11
QHD / 1440p	6−7	4−5
4K / 2160p	5−6	4−5
low / 720p	35−40	35−40
medium / 1080p	24−27	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 12% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p	30−35	27−30
ultra / 1080p	27−30	24−27
QHD / 1440p	10−12	8−9
4K / 2160p	7−8	6−7
low / 720p	65−70	60−65
medium / 1080p	35−40	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 11% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	−	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro K2200M and Tesla C2050 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	230−240	220−230
medium / 768p	200−210	190−200
ultra / 1080p	110−120	110−120
QHD / 1440p	85−90	70−75
4K / 2160p	45−50	35−40
high / 768p	160−170	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	50−55	45−50
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
medium / 768p	100−110	100−110
ultra / 1080p	75−80	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p	24−27	21−24
ultra / 1080p	21−24	20−22
QHD / 1440p	18−20	18−20
4K / 2160p	7−8	7−8
low / 720p	50−55	45−50
medium / 1080p	24−27	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 8% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p	30−35	27−30
ultra / 1080p	24−27	21−24
QHD / 1440p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	120−130	110−120
medium / 1080p	70−75	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 12% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p	30−35	30−35
ultra / 1080p	24−27	21−24
QHD / 1440p	12−14	10−12
4K / 2160p	12−14	−
low / 720p	65−70	60−65
medium / 1080p	35−40	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 6% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p	100−110	95−100
medium / 768p	90−95	85−90
high / 1080p	40−45	35−40
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
QHD / 1440p	6−7	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p	12−14	10−12
ultra / 1080p	10−11	9−10
4K / 2160p	2−3	2−3
low / 720p	40−45	35−40
medium / 1080p	16−18	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 13% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
medium / 1080p	110−120	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 4% more, than Tesla C2050.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	70−75	65−70
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p	14−16	14−16
ultra / 1080p	10−11	9−10
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
4K / 2160p	1−2	−
low / 720p	35−40	35−40
medium / 1080p	20−22	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p	70−75	65−70
medium / 768p	45−50	40−45
high / 1080p	24−27	21−24
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
4K / 2160p	8−9	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 10% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	35−40
high / 768p	55−60	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 1% more, than Tesla C2050.

Full Specs

	Quadro K2200M	Tesla C2050
Architecture	Maxwell	Fermi
Code name	GM107	GF100
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	19 July 2014	25 July 2011
Pipelines	640	448
Core clock speed	667 MHz	574 MHz
Transistor count	1,870 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	26.68	32.14
Floating-point performance	853.8 gflops	1,030.4 gflops
Length		248 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	144.0 GB/s
DirectX	12	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	5.0	2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		90 Mh/s
Optimus	+
Display Port	1.2
3D Vision Pro	+
Mosaic	+
nView Display Management	+

Quadro K2200M vs Tesla C2050

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares